Jump to content


Photo

HD server on laptop or Surface Pro 3?

surface pro laptop

  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 dingledays

dingledays

    Newbie

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 1 posts

Posted 07 March 2015 - 02:27 AM

Folks,

 

I've undergone a sweeping rationalisation of my home network to a lower power and physical footprint. For example, all my home automation is now running on Raspberry PIs and media services on Synology NAS, leaving only Air Video HD Server running on what is a very high spec Windows box.

 

I was today considering buying an i7 laptop - or even a Surface Pro 3 (i7 8gb RAM integrated graphics)- so am keen to understand if anyone has HD Server running on these types of devices? I have a large media library with plenty of 1080p and iPads, so Air Video is very much a busy component in our house.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Jonathan


  • Josephhink likes this

#2 Sunrise

Sunrise

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 116 posts

Posted 07 March 2015 - 02:46 PM

This all depends a lot on:

 

1) How many simultaneous playback sessions (several users play several files simultaneously) there are at your home at the very maximum and

2) whether the content you serve from your large media library is mostly in native MP4 containers (H.264, AAC audio) or if you need to do a lot of transcoding in parallel

 

If you're going after lower power and physical footprint, you should consider buying an Intel NUC (http://www.anandtech...for-enthusiasts). The NUC5I5RYK has a Broadwell-U, which only has 15W TDP, which is an Intel mobile CPU optimized for power usage. There will also be another Intel NUC coming (http://www.pcper.com/news/General-Tech/New-Intel-NUC-Will-Feature-i7-Broadwell-U-CPU-Iris-6100-Graphics), which has a higher 28W TDP CPU and is also specced a bit higher.

 

These NUCs should easily handle several Direct Streaming / MP4 remuxing sessions, if the content is in a native format. If the content needs to be transcoded, and should you decide to buy a NUC, you can also use Intels QuickSync, which will barely use your CPU at all, which means that is also saves a lot on power.

 

All playback (decoding) and transcoding will be accelerated by QuickSync and it is supported since the newest Air Video HD releases (http://forums.inmeth...ed-transcoding/). Currently, there is a limit of one transcoding session that can be hardware accelerated though, multiple session in parallel will use the CPU for the remaining sessions. QuickSync still is a bit lower quality compared to software decoding though, so you need to test yourself if the quality is sufficient for you.

 

There you go.



#3 admin

admin

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 2585 posts

Posted 09 March 2015 - 02:53 PM

Actually, the limitation of one session should only apply for Mac users. QuickSync on Windows can handle multiple parallel sessions (although the performance will divide of course).



#4 Danny

Danny

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 99 posts

Posted 11 March 2015 - 03:51 PM

What number is that limitation on Mac? Just curious.



#5 admin

admin

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 2585 posts

Posted 11 March 2015 - 03:52 PM

Not sure what you mean. Only one decoding session can be hardware accelerated at a time. Same with encoding. So if one session is hardware accelerated, other will fall-back to software. But that's only on Mac.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users